If a girl is wearing a nice dress in a public place, which do you think looks better. a hosed leg or bare?

ok guys let the ladies know what you like. most women since the early 90%26#039;s have stopped wearing pantyhose or nylons. why? i dont know. most people in general male and female dont dress up that much anymore. but i think a girls nylon leg and foot is damn sexy. women say that pantyhose are uncomfortable but they will wear 4%26quot; platform shoes to impress a guy. and will generally wear what they think guys like. so heres the question. which do think looks better when a girl is trying to dress up. a hosed leg or a bare leg?

If a girl is wearing a nice dress in a public place, which do you think looks better. a hosed leg or bare?
I know that I am not a guy but from a ladies point I must say that stockings/pantyhose are back in. The bare leg/trailer trash look is out. There are still a few hold outs trying to get by without hose but they are out of touch with current fashion. Pantyhose are not %26quot;old lady%26quot; they show class and refinement. Something that has been lost lately. Unless you are going for the 12 year old look, you need to wear hose. I prefer them without panties for a sexier, smoother look. And yes there is something sexy about a butt covered in only sheer pantyhose!
Reply:Pantyhose definitely! Who wants to look at horrific bare legs? Since when did trailer trash look good any how? Have you seen what these women running around with no hose look like?There should be a town ordinance against it.Seriously though.It should be a no brainer for young ladies.But much like a anorexic thinks that they are fat when they are actually withering away,ladies think they look good bare legged when they really don%26#039;t.Hosiery is very sexy on a lady.No question about it.
Reply:Stockings or pantyhose. It makes no difference to me. I like my lady with nylon covered legs.
Reply:Definatley pantyhose,a nice dress without pantyhose would look trashy.I agree with one of the above,lets bring back the Daisey Duke look.
Reply:I think both are good depending on the weather and the woman%26#039;s sensivity to it. The legs are just one of the many things due to which I%26#039;m attracted to a woman, this if we only talk of the appearence, that%26#039;s obviovsly not enough to me. I don%26#039;t understand why one had to be obsessed by either bare or hosy leg. Why do they think a girl shoud go bare legged in winter or cook wearing pantyhose in summer? Just think the sexyness involved in both way of dress. As for the shoes I prefer low or medium heels.
Reply:Stockings, not pantyhose. Pantyhose look a little better than bare legs but whats the fun in a nylon covered butt.





Stockings make the legs look super because they are thinner than pantyhose, plus they end at the end of the thigh. The girls underwear in more visible, and half the time she is wearing a garter belt which is even more sexy.





Bare legs in the office or anywhere dressy is just plain trashy, and where I come from employers won%26#039;t have it, they insist on women wearing hose.
Reply:Definitely stockings. Bare legs look trashy and unladylike. And incidentally, stockings (the kind you wear held up by a garter belt or girdle) are coming back in fashion. The %26quot;bare leg%26quot; look is so over.
Reply:bare always
Reply:Gotta go with the hosed. No doubt about it.
Reply:No doubt pantyhose look better. They even look better when the woman is wearing short jean shorts, like Daisy Duke! Remember that? That was sooooooooooo sexy!
Reply:bare leg.
Reply:bare. hose and nylons are so cheesy and old lady!
Reply:duh!! the bare leg
Reply:Bare leg for sure!
Reply:definately bare legs.....


and the occasional fishnets OH MY!!
Reply:bare leggs are awesomely sexy in my opinion



dental